Analyze how often different bubble detection signals agree or disagree, and which combinations produce the highest composite risk scores
Total Snapshots
213
38 assets
Most Correlated
89%
GSADF + Complexity
Least Correlated
12%
Complexity + Lyapunov
Top Combo Score
65.4
GSADF + Hawkes + LPPL + Lyapunov (7x)
Pairwise Signal Agreement Matrix
All Signal Pairs Ranked by Agreement
#
Signal A
Signal B
Agreement
Co-Fires
Samples
Avg Composite When Both Fire
1
GSADF
Complexity
89%
0
213
—
2
Complexity
Transfer Entropy
85%
0
213
—
3
GSADF
Transfer Entropy
80%
0
213
—
4
Hawkes
Lyapunov
70%
139
213
45.1
5
LPPL
Transfer Entropy
58%
18
213
40.2
6
LPPL
Complexity
55%
5
213
50.8
7
GSADF
LPPL
51%
7
213
65.4
8
Hawkes
LPPL
47%
70
213
45.8
9
LPPL
Lyapunov
45%
86
213
42.8
10
GSADF
Hawkes
37%
18
213
57.1
11
Hawkes
Complexity
31%
5
213
54.0
12
Hawkes
Transfer Entropy
26%
10
213
47.9
13
Lyapunov
Transfer Entropy
21%
23
213
41.5
14
GSADF
Lyapunov
18%
17
213
57.3
15
Complexity
Lyapunov
12%
4
213
48.3
Signal correlation is computed from composite bubble analysis snapshots. A signal "fires" when its score exceeds 50. Higher agreement between signals may indicate redundancy; lower agreement suggests independent risk detection.